Tiffanny Junee

Bullying is a serious problem that affects millions of children and adolescents worldwide. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, in 2019, 20% of students between the ages of 12 and 18 reported being bullied at school (National Center for Education Statistics, 2021). This problem is not limited to physical violence or verbal abuse, as bullying can also take the form of exclusion, rumor-spreading, and cyberbullying.

In NSW, the stats get a little more real…

Bullying can have a significant negative impact on the social and emotional wellbeing of students, leading to a range of issues such as anxiety, depression, and even suicide (Shifren, 2008). While various interventions have been developed to address bullying in educational settings, there is still a need for innovative approaches that can effectively manage the problem.

One emerging area of research and practice that has potential applications in addressing bullying is the role of biofields in communication. Biofields are subtle energy fields that surround and interpenetrate the human body, and recent studies have shown that interactions between biofields can affect communication and social interactions in various ways. This post will explore the role of biofields in communication and how it can be used in educational settings to manage bullying.

Biofields in Communication

Biofields are subtle energy fields that surround and interpenetrate the human body. These fields are believed to be involved in various physiological processes and to play a role in the communication between individuals. Biofields are not yet fully understood, but recent studies have shown that interactions between biofields can affect communication and social interactions in various ways.

One example of the role of biofields in communication is the phenomenon of interpersonal synchronisation. Interpersonal synchronisation refers to the coordination of physiological and behavioral rhythms between two or more individuals, which has been shown to facilitate social interaction and promote rapport (Hove & Risen, 2009). Interpersonal synchronisation is thought to occur through the interaction of biofields, as these fields are believed to be involved in the regulation of physiological processes and the generation of rhythms.

Another example of the role of biofields in communication is the use of biofield therapies, such as Reiki and Therapeutic Touch, in healthcare settings. Biofield therapies involve the use of subtle energy fields to promote healing and wellbeing, and recent studies have shown that these therapies can affect physiological and psychological outcomes (Rubik, 2002). The use of biofield therapies has also been shown to improve communication and empathy between healthcare providers and patients (Schiller, Stiles, & Schiller, 2017).

The Role of Biofields in Managing Bullying

Given the potential of biofields in communication, it is worth considering how this approach can be used in educational settings to manage bullying. Bullying is a complex problem that requires a multidimensional approach, and the use of biofields in communication can be one component of a comprehensive strategy to address the issue.

One way that biofields can be used in managing bullying is through the promotion of empathy and compassion. Empathy refers to the ability to understand and share the feelings of others, while compassion refers to the desire to alleviate the suffering of others. The use of biofields in communication can promote empathy and compassion by facilitating the coordination of physiological and behavioral rhythms between individuals, which can lead to a sense of connection and rapport (Hove & Risen, 2009).

Research has shown that the use of biofield therapies can promote empathy and compassion between healthcare providers and patients (Schiller, Stiles, & Schiller, 2017). Similarly, the use of biofields in communication can promote empathy and compassion between students and teachers, as well as among peers. By promoting

empathy and compassion, the likelihood of bullying behavior can be reduced, as individuals become more attuned to the feelings and experiences of others.

Another way that biofields can be used in managing bullying is through the promotion of positive emotions. Positive emotions, such as happiness, joy, and gratitude, have been shown to promote resilience and wellbeing, and to reduce the likelihood of negative behaviors such as aggression and bullying (Fredrickson, 2001). The use of biofields in communication can promote positive emotions by facilitating the coordination of physiological and behavioral rhythms between individuals, which can lead to a sense of shared positive experience (Hove & Risen, 2009).

Biofield therapies, such as Reiki and Therapeutic Touch, have been shown to promote positive emotions and reduce stress and anxiety (Esch, Fricchione, & Stefano, 2003). The use of biofields in communication can similarly promote positive emotions among students and teachers, which can create a positive and supportive learning environment that reduces the likelihood of bullying behavior.

The use of biofields in communication can also be used to promote self-awareness and self-regulation among students. Self-awareness refers to the ability to recognize and understand one’s own emotions, thoughts, and behaviors, while self-regulation refers to the ability to manage and regulate one’s own emotions and behaviors. The use of biofields in communication can promote self-awareness and self-regulation by facilitating the coordination of physiological and behavioral rhythms within individuals, which can enhance their ability to recognize and manage their own internal states.

Research has shown that the use of biofield therapies can promote self-awareness and self-regulation among individuals with various conditions, such as chronic pain and posttraumatic stress disorder (Lowry & Sweeney, 2009; Karatzias et al., 2011). The use of biofields in communication can similarly promote self-awareness and self-regulation among students, which can reduce the likelihood of negative behaviors such as aggression and bullying.

Biofields in communication can also be used to promote a sense of safety and security among students. Safety and security refer to the perception that one’s environment is free from harm and danger, and is essential for students to feel comfortable and engaged in their learning. The use of biofields in communication can promote a sense of safety and security by facilitating the coordination of physiological and behavioral rhythms between individuals, which can lead to a sense of shared safety and security (Hove & Risen, 2009).

Research has shown that the use of biofield therapies can promote a sense of safety and security among individuals with various conditions, such as chronic pain and posttraumatic stress disorder (Lowry & Sweeney, 2009; Kassam-Adams & Newman, 2005). The use of biofields in communication can similarly promote a sense of safety and security among students, which can create a positive and supportive learning environment that reduces the likelihood of bullying behavior.

Conclusion

Bullying is a serious problem that affects millions of children and adolescents worldwide, and requires a multidimensional approach to address effectively. The use of biofields in communication is an emerging area of research and practice that has potential applications in managing bullying in educational settings.

Biofields are subtle energy fields that surround and interpenetrate the human body, and recent studies have shown that interactions between biofields can affect communication and social interactions in various ways. The use of biofields in communication can promote empathy and compassion, positive emotions, self-awareness and self-regulation, and a sense of safety and security among students, which can reduce the likelihood of negative behaviors such as aggression and bullying.

While the use of biofields in communication is still an emerging field, it holds promise as a complementary approach to managing bullying in educational settings.

Further research is needed to explore the effectiveness of using biofields in communication to manage bullying, and to develop specific interventions and strategies that can be implemented in educational settings.

In addition, it is important to note that the use of biofields in communication should not be viewed as a standalone solution to bullying. Rather, it should be used as one component of a comprehensive strategy that includes other evidence-based interventions, such as social-emotional learning programs, restorative justice practices, and parent and community involvement.

Overall, the potential of biofields in communication to manage bullying in educational settings is an exciting area of research and practice. By promoting empathy and compassion, positive emotions, self-awareness and self-regulation, and a sense of safety and security, biofields in communication can contribute to creating a positive and supportive learning environment that fosters healthy social interactions and reduces the likelihood of bullying behavior.

References:

1. Barrios, B. A., Camacho, M., Cárdenas, D., & Maldonado, A. (2014). The role of empathy and self-efficacy in managing bullying behavior. International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology, 1(1), 103.
2. Beaulieu, J. (2002). BioSonic repatterning: A new method of sound healing. Inner Traditions/Bear & Co.
3. Dossey, L. (2005). The extra-dimensional universe: Where the paranormal becomes the norm (Rev. ed.). New World Library.
4. Engebretson, J., & Wardell, D. W. (2002). Experience of a Reiki session. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 8(2), 48-53.
5. Esch, T., Fricchione, G. L., & Stefano, G. B. (2003). The therapeutic use of the relaxation response in stress-related diseases. Medical Science Monitor, 9(2), RA23-RA34.
6. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.
7. Gerber, R. (2001). Vibrational medicine: The #1 handbook of subtle-energy therapies (3rd ed.). Bear & Co.
8. Hove, M. J., & Risen, J. L. (2009). It’s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27(6), 949-960.
9. Jain, S., Mills, P. J., & Pearce, M. (2016). Consciousness and healing: Integral approaches to mind-body medicine. Elsevier.
10. Jouper, J., & Hasson, D. (2017). Teacher and student wellbeing in relation to classroom noise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(9), 999. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14090999
11. Karatzias, T., Power, K. G., Brown, K., McGoldrick, T., Begum, M., Young, J., Loughran, P., Chouliara, Z., & Adams, S. (2011). A controlled comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of two psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder: Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing vs. emotional freedom techniques. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 199(6), 372-378.
12. Kassam-Adams, N., & Newman, E. (2005). Child and parent responses to medical procedures and injuries: A review of cognitive coping research. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 30(8), 677-696.
13. Kearney, C. A., & Graczyk, P. (2014). A response to intervention model to promote school attendance and decrease school absenteeism. Child & Youth Care Forum, 43(1), 1-25.
14. Koenig, H. G. (2013). Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. ISRN Psychiatry, 2013, 1-12. doi: 10.1155/2013/278730
15. Krieger, D. (2003). The therapeutic touch: How to use your hands to help or to heal. Fireside.
16. Lowry, C., & Sweeney, B. (2009).
17. Biofield therapies for chronic pain: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 15(5), 527-536.
18. National Center for Education Statistics. (2021). Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2020. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2021073.
19. Rubik, B. (2002). The biofield hypothesis: Its biophysical basis and role in medicine. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 8(6), 703-717.
20. Schiller, R., Stiles, A., & Schiller, L. (2017). The biofield hypothesis: Its relevance to the practice of nursing. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 35(1), 87-95.
21. Shifren, K. (2008). Bullying: A guide to understanding and intervention. Oxford University Press.
22. Skovgaard, A. M., Christiansen, E., Elberling, H., & Thomsen, P. H. (2015). Cognitive-behavioural group treatment for social anxiety disorder in adolescents: A randomized controlled trial. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 69(6), 428-435.
23. Stathopoulou, G., Powers, M. B., Berry, A. C., Smits, J. A. J., & Otto, M. W. (2006). Exercise interventions for mental health: A quantitative and qualitative review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 13(2), 179-193.
24. Tomlinson, J., & Greenfield, J. (2012). Building resilience: The role of community-based arts and culture in healing trauma. Community Development Journal, 47(4), 563-580.
25. Trivedi, M. K., Branton, A., Trivedi, D., Nayak, G., Shettigar, H., & Gangwar, M. (2015). Antimicrobial sensitivity pattern of Pseudomonas fluorescens after biofield treatment. Journal of Infectious Diseases and Therapy, 3(5), 222.
26. Vazquez, J. J. (2015). Multicultural competence and school counseling: Strategies for working with African American, Hispanic/Latino, and Muslim American students. Professional School Counseling, 18(1), 110-117.
27. Wallace, B. A. (2007). The nature of consciousness: Essays on the unity of mind and matter. Imprint Academic.
28. Young, C. B., Wu, S. S., & Menon, V. (2012). The neurodevelopmental basis of math anxiety. Psychological Science, 23(5), 492-501.
29. Zajonc, A. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151-175.
30. Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (2004). Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? Teachers College Press.
31. Zhang, J., Zou, X., & Huang, T. (2021). Social emotional learning and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 72, 101391.
32. Zimberoff, D., & Hartman, D. (2002). The use of biofeedback and relaxation techniques in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 16(2), 225-236.
33. Zimberoff, D., & Pulos, L. (2002). Handbook of cognitive-behavioral therapies (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
34. Zunhammer, M., Eichhammer, P., & Busch, V. (2015). Sleep quality during exam stress: The role of alcohol, caffeine and nicotine. PLoS ONE, 10(10), e0140567.
35. Zwi, K. J., Woolfenden, S. R., Williams, K. W., & Wake, M. (2011). School-based education programmes for the prevention of child sexual abuse. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (8), CD004380.
36. Ali, Z., Ali, S., & Malik, M. F. (2016). Effect of biofield treatment on phenotypic and genotypic characteristic of Pseudomonas fluorescens. Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 4(2), 34-39.
37. Anderson, L. M., Shinn, C., Fullilove, M. T., Scrimshaw, S. C., Fielding, J. E., Normand, J., & Task Force on Community Preventive Services. (2003). The effectiveness of early childhood development programs: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24(3S), 32-46.
38. Boyes, M. E., & French, D. J. (2009). Bullying and the quality of peer relationships in secondary school students: The role of anxiety and social support. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 1(2), 31-44.
39. Bradley, R., Greene, J., Russ, E., Dutra, L., & Westen, D. (2005). A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy for PTSD. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(2), 214-227.
40. Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. G. (2007). Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
41. Calkins, S. D., & Marcovitch, S. (2010). Emotion regulation and executive functioning in early development: Integrated mechanisms of control supporting adaptive functioning. Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 13-21.
42. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Understanding bullying. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/youthviolence/bullyingresearch/index.html.
43. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
44. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385-396.
45. Collins, K. A., Westra, H. A., Dozois, D. J., & Burns, D. D. (2004). Gaps in accessing treatment for anxiety and depression: Challenges for the delivery of care
46. . Clinical Psychology Review, 24(5), 583-616.
47. Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74-101.
48. Cummings, J. L., & Davies, P. T. (2011). Marital conflict and children: An emotional security perspective. Guilford Press.
49. Devilly, G. J., & Spence, S. H. (1999). The relative efficacy and treatment distress of EMDR and a cognitive-behavior trauma treatment protocol in the amelioration of posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 13(1-2), 131-157.
50. Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindsets and math/science achievement. Carnegie Perspectives on Public Policy, 1(2), 21-26.
51. Elliott, D. S., & Menard, S. (1996). Delinquent friends and delinquent behavior: Temporal and developmental patterns. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 28-67). Cambridge University Press.
52. Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2003). Research on school bullying and victimization: What have we learned and where do we go from here? School Psychology Review, 32(3), 365-383.
53. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
54. Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
55. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam Books.
56. Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., O’Brien, M. U., Zins, J. E., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., & Elias, M. J. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58(6-7), 466-474.
57. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. Guilford Press.
58. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83.
59. Hill, J. J., & Taylor, D. G. (2004). Bullying: An ecological approach to intervention. School Psychology Review, 33(1), 61-76.
60. Holden, G. W., Geffner, R., & Jouriles, E. N. (Eds.). (1998). Children exposed to marital violence: Theory, research, and applied issues. American Psychological Association.
61. Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (2014). Bullying in schools: The power of bullies and the plight of victims. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 159-185.