Revisiting Fields & Habitus
Warning: Geeking Out
Pierre Bourdieu was a French sociologist who made significant contributions to the field of sociology, particularly in the areas of social theory, culture, education, and politics.
Bourdieu’s work was focused on understanding the social structures and cultural practices that shape individuals’ lives and their social and economic opportunities.
For purely indulgent reasons, this post will explore Bourdieu’s concepts of fields and habitus, and their implications for understanding social inequality and social change.
One of Bourdieu’s key contributions to sociology is his concept of fields. According to Bourdieu, social life is organised around fields, which are specific social spaces in which individuals and groups compete for various forms of capital, such as economic, cultural, and social capital (Bourdieu, 1986).
Examples of fields include the art world, the academic world, and the political world. Fields are characterised by their own sets of rules, values, and practices, and individuals who want to succeed in a given field must understand and master these cultural codes (Bourdieu, 1977).
Bourdieu argued that individuals’ success in a given field is determined by their possession of the appropriate form of capital for that field.
For example, in the academic world, cultural capital such as education and knowledge of academic norms is highly valued, while in the economic world, financial capital is the most important form of capital (Bourdieu, 1986).
Bourdieu’s theory of fields emphasizes that success in a given field is not solely determined by individual merit, but also by an individual’s social position and the amount and type of capital they possess.
Bourdieu’s concept of habitus is closely related to his theory of fields.
Habitus refers to a set of dispositions, attitudes, and habits that are acquired through socialization and shape an individual’s thoughts, actions, and choices (Bourdieu, 1990).
Habitus is shaped by an individual’s experiences and position in social space, and reflects their social class, education, and cultural background.
Habitus guides individuals’ actions and choices, and enables them to navigate social spaces and compete for various forms of capital.
Bourdieu argued that habitus shapes individuals’ behavior within social fields, and their success in these fields reinforces and reinforces their habitus (Bourdieu, 1990).
For example, an individual who grows up in a working-class family may develop a habitus that values practical skills and hard work, and may therefore excel in a field that values these traits, such as manual labor or certain sports.
At the same time, their success in this field reinforces their habitus, shaping their future choices and opportunities.
Interplay between Fields and Habitus
Bourdieu’s concepts of fields and habitus are closely related, as habitus shapes individuals’ behavior within social fields, and their success in these fields reinforces and reinforces their habitus.
Bourdieu’s theory emphasizes that social life is structured by the interplay between individuals’ habitus and the cultural codes of various fields.
Individuals who grow up in different social contexts develop different habitus, which guide their actions and choices in ways that reproduce and reinforce social class and other forms of inequality.
Implications for Social Inequality
Bourdieu’s concepts of fields and habitus are key to understanding how social inequalities are reproduced across generations.
Individuals who grow up in different social contexts develop different habitus, which guide their actions and choices in ways that reproduce and reinforce social class and other forms of inequality (Bourdieu & Passeron, 1977).
Bourdieu’s theory highlights the ways in which social inequality is not solely determined by individual merit or effort, but is also shaped by larger social structures and cultural practices.
Bourdieu also argued that individuals and groups can challenge these structures through collective action and social change.
In order to create more equal and just societies, Bourdieu believed it is necessary to change the cultural codes and structures of social fields.
This requires collective action and social movements that challenge the existing power structures and promote more inclusive and democratic forms of social organization (Bourdieu, 1998).
Pierre Bourdieu’s concepts of fields and habitus are important contributions to the field of sociology, and have implications for understanding social inequality and social change.
Bourdieu’s theory emphasises the interplay between individuals’ habitus and the cultural codes of various fields, and highlights the ways in which social inequality is reproduced and reinforced through larger social structures and cultural practices.
By understanding the role of fields and habitus in shaping individuals’ lives, we can develop strategies for promoting more inclusive and democratic societies.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2015). On the state: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1989-1992. Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage.
Grenfell, M. (2008). Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts. Acumen.
Jenkins, R. (1992). Pierre Bourdieu. Routledge.
Lamont, M. (1992). Money, morals, and manners: The culture of the French and American upper-middle class. University of Chicago Press.
Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. University of Chicago Press.
Wacquant, L. J. D. (1989). Towards a social praxeology: The structure and logic of Bourdieu’s sociology. In P. Bourdieu & L. J. D. Wacquant (Eds.), An invitation to reflexive sociology (pp. 1-61). University of Chicago Press.
Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). Towards a reflexive sociology: A workshop with Pierre Bourdieu. Sociological Theory, 10(1), 26-63.